The diagram illustrates the performance of pumps configured in parallel, comparing the behaviour of a single pump versus two pumps. In this configuration, the two pumps operate simultaneously to handle the fluid flow. The graph plots head (H) on the vertical axis and flow rate (Q) on the horizontal axis, showing how the combination of two pumps significantly enhances the system's capacity. The two-pump curve is positioned above the single-pump curve, indicating a marked increase in flow rate while maintaining a similar head.
This parallel arrangement is particularly beneficial in applications where the system requires higher flow rates without a significant rise in pressure. By using two pumps in parallel, it becomes possible to efficiently transport more fluid through the system while avoiding excessive pressure increases. This makes the parallel configuration ideal for situations where the primary objective is to improve flow capacity without overloading the system or causing wear due to high-pressure conditions.
The second diagram illustrates the performance of pumps arranged in series, highlighting the difference between a single pump and two pumps in this configuration. When pumps are connected in series, the two-pump curve is significantly elevated above the single-pump curve. This indicates a substantial increase in head (H) while the flow rate (Q) remains almost unchanged.
This series configuration is particularly advantageous for systems where increased pressure is a priority over higher flow rates. It is commonly employed in applications requiring a boost in system pressure to overcome resistance in the pipeline, deliver fluid to elevated locations, or meet other high-head requirements. The arrangement ensures that the energy added by each pump is cumulative, making it an effective solution for challenging pressure demands without altering the flow rate substantially.
The two diagrams compare the performance of pump configurations, illustrating how one pump behaves in relation to two pumps under different arrangements based on head (H) and flow rate (Q). In the first diagram, the pumps are configured in parallel, where the two-pump curve lies higher than the single-pump curve, indicating an increase in flow rate while maintaining a similar head. This configuration is particularly advantageous when the system demands higher flow rates without requiring a substantial increase in pressure. The parallel arrangement is suitable for applications where the main objective is to move more fluid at the same or slightly increased pressure.
We provide a thorough evaluation of single and multi-loop piping networks to ensure optimal performance and efficiency. Our analysis identifies flow distribution, pressure drops and potential bottlenecks in the system. Whether you are designing a new network or optimising an existing one, we ensure that your piping network delivers consistent and reliable flow to meet operational demands while minimising energy consumption.
Our engineers determine the most suitable pump for your system by calculating accurate flow rates and head requirements. Proper pump sizing not only ensures efficient operation but also reduces energy costs and prolongs pump lifespan. We consider factors such as system curves, fluid properties and operational demands to recommend pumps that align with your specific needs.
Excessive pressure losses in pipelines can lead to energy inefficiencies, increased operational costs, and equipment wear. Our pressure drop calculations pinpoint areas of concern and recommend strategies to minimise losses. By analysing pipeline length, diameter, roughness, and flow characteristics, we help optimise your system for smoother and more efficient fluid transport.
Imbalanced flow distribution in complex networks can lead to inefficiencies and underperformance. Our system balancing services ensure even flow distribution across all branches of your network, improving operational reliability and efficiency. Using advanced simulation tools, we identify and correct imbalances to achieve optimal performance.
Water hammer and pressure surges can cause significant damage to pipelines and equipment. Our surge analysis services identify potential risks and propose mitigation strategies such as surge tanks, relief valves, or controlled flow adjustments. By addressing these risks, we safeguard your system against costly downtimes and repairs.
Flow issues such as cavitation, velocity imbalances, or blockages can disrupt operations and damage equipment. Our pipeline troubleshooting services use detailed simulations and engineering expertise to diagnose and resolve these problems. We provide practical solutions that restore system functionality and prevent recurring issues, ensuring seamless operations.
Our professional pipe flow simulation consultants are dedicated to enhancing the efficiency and reliability of your pipeline systems through comprehensive pipe flow analysis services. With years of expertise, our experienced engineers leverage advanced tools to model fluid dynamics, optimise pipe networks, and minimise pressure drop, ensuring your systems consistently perform at their best. Whether you require accurate pump sizing, effective network balancing, or solutions to troubleshoot flow issues, our tailored services provide actionable insights that drive operational improvements and cost savings.
Pressure Drop: as fluid moves through a pipe, friction between the fluid and the pipe wall resists the flow. Higher velocities result in more turbulent flow, increasing friction losses. Friction loss is proportional to the square of velocity in turbulent flow, making velocity a critical factor in pressure drop calculations. This is the energy loss per unit weight of the fluid due to friction. Higher head losses require more energy input (pumping power) to maintain flow, leading to higher operational costs.
Erosion and Corrosion: at high velocities, fluid particles, especially if abrasive (e.g., sand or debris), impact the pipe walls with greater force. This wears down the inner surface, reducing the pipe’s thickness and potentially leading to failure. High-velocity flow can disrupt protective oxide layers on pipe walls, especially in metal pipes, exposing the material to aggressive environments (e.g., chemical attack, oxygenation), accelerating corrosion rates.
Flow-Induced Vibration: high velocity can cause turbulence near pipe bends, elbows, or fittings, leading to fluctuating forces on the pipe structure. Over time, these vibrations can cause fatigue cracks and structural damage. Certain flow velocities can match the natural frequency of the piping system, leading to resonance, amplifying vibrations and potentially causing catastrophic failure.
Cavitation: in high-velocity liquid flow, localised drops in pressure (e.g., at restrictions like orifices or valves) can fall below the liquid’s vapour pressure, forming vapour bubbles. When these bubbles collapse in regions of higher pressure, they release high-energy impacts that can damage pipe walls, valves, and fittings, leading to pitting and reduced lifespan.
Noise: high velocity increases turbulence, generating sound waves that can propagate through the fluid and pipe walls. Vibrations caused by high-velocity flow can also produce audible noise, which can be problematic in environments where noise control is essential (e.g., hospitals, offices).
Dynamic Pressure and Forces: high velocities increase dynamic pressure, which is the pressure exerted due to the fluid’s motion. This exerts larger forces on pipe bends, tees, valves, and other fittings. These forces need to be counteracted using appropriate pipe supports and anchors to prevent movement or failure of the piping system.
Water Hammer: sudden changes in velocity, such as rapid valve closures or pump stoppages, cause pressure waves to propagate through the fluid. The higher the velocity, the more severe these pressure surges. Water hammer can result in noise, vibration, or even catastrophic pipe rupture, necessitating pressure relief systems and slow-closing valves in high-velocity systems.
Flow Regime and Stability: low velocities generally result in laminar flow, characterised by smooth, predictable motion. High velocities usually lead to turbulent flow, which enhances mixing but increases energy losses. In systems carrying more than one phase (e.g., gas-liquid or liquid-solid), high velocities can destabilise the flow, causing slugging, flow separation, or uneven phase distribution, which can affect equipment downstream.
Heat Transfer: higher velocities improve convective heat transfer by increasing the turbulence near pipe walls, which reduces the thermal boundary layer thickness. Although heat transfer improves, the increased velocity requires more pumping power, leading to higher operational costs. Balancing velocity for efficient heat transfer and minimal energy use is essential.
Scalability and Fouling: at low velocities, heavier particles in the fluid can settle at the bottom of the pipe, leading to blockages or reduced flow capacity. At excessively high velocities, deposits or fouling layers can be dislodged, contaminating downstream equipment or causing abrasive wear.
To mitigate velocity effects in piping, adhere to design standards to maintain optimal velocity limits for the fluid type and piping material. Select erosion- and corrosion-resistant materials, such as stainless steel or lined pipes, to withstand high velocities. Optimise pipe sizing to balance velocity, pressure drop, and system efficiency, and ensure robust supports and anchors to manage dynamic forces and vibrations. Install flow meters and pressure gauges for continuous monitoring to detect velocity-related issues early. Incorporate slow-closing valves and pressure relief systems to prevent water hammer, and design for adequate turbulence to enhance heat transfer while minimising energy costs. Regular maintenance and inspections are critical for long-term efficiency and safety.
This pipe flow simulation models a complex network of interconnected pipelines, tanks, and components to analyse flow distribution, pressure drops, and velocity variations. The system features multiple branching paths with flow splitting at various junctions, ensuring fluid delivery to end-use points. The colour-coded pipes indicate velocities ranging from 0.222 m/s to 7.605 m/s, highlighting areas of high flow concentration. The simulation reveals pressure drops caused by frictional losses, flow division, and elevation changes, with pressure varying across nodes. High-velocity segments suggest potential bottlenecks or areas that may require design adjustments to reduce pressure losses and pipe wear. The branching design balances flow distribution across parallel paths to avoid overloading specific sections. This analysis provides critical insights for optimising the system, ensuring efficient flow, minimising losses, and supporting proper sizing of pumps and other components. The results help refine the design to achieve reliable and balanced performance throughout the network.
The pipe flow simulation analyses the hydraulic performance of a fluid transport system to determine the pressure drop and size an appropriate pump. The system includes interconnected pipes, nodes, and components, with flow velocity consistent at 1.968 m/s throughout. The simulation shows a gradual pressure reduction due to frictional losses, elevation changes, and system fittings, starting at 0.2033 bar.g at the storage tank and dropping to -0.1584 bar.g near the pump inlet. The pump at PU-4002 is critical in overcoming these losses to maintain the required flow rate and pressure for fluid delivery to the outlet. Using this analysis, the total head loss is calculated to guide the pump selection, ensuring efficient operation without issues like cavitation or insufficient outlet pressure.
AUSTRALIA SINGAPORE